On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 7:59 AM Nikolay Tsanov <[email protected]> wrote: >...
> The choice of a version control system goes far beyond the tech stack, it > defines the governance at the technology layer of the Bloodhound > architecture > No. Governance is defined by Apache rules of peer conduct. The version control system is orthogonal to how a community reaches consensus and develops code. If English language is the issue and you meant "DESIGN at the technology layer of the Bloodhound architecture", then you're wrong. A version control system has zero impact on architecture. The VCS merely helps to organize workflow/process. git sucks at this, GitHub is awesome at this, and svn falls in between. >... > In personal capacity, I must regretfully let you know that I will not > invest any time until this essential technology architecture concern (Git > vs SVN) is formally addressed > Never attempt extortion of the community to get what you want. You can leave. Your contributions are not worth more than anybody else's, and are certainly not required. The version control choice will not be made by you. -g
