seems jenkins still not trigger the build

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 12:29 AM, Jia Zhai <[email protected]> wrote:

> cancelled and submitted just now.
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Flavio Junqueira <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, the find patches link seems to be broken and I can't see the result
>> of the build in the list. Just cancel the patch are make it patch available
>> immediately after to give Jenkins a kick. Let's see if it works this time.
>>
>> -Flavio
>>
>> > On 14 Oct 2015, at 14:46, Jia Zhai <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Flavio,
>> > Thanks for the instruction, Now I see how this build is triggered, but
>> > seems this jenkins job --
>> > https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-trunk-find-patches-available/
>> --
>> > was not able to find the patch that I provided in BOOKKEEPER-876 (that
>> > patch has been provided for days, and this "find patches" job is set to
>> run
>> > every 10 minutes).
>> >
>> > Would you please help check what is wrong with this?
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 9:19 PM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hey Jia,
>> >>
>> >> Have a look at https://builds.apache.org <https://builds.apache.org/>
>> to
>> >> see if the job has been queued.
>> >>
>> >> -Flavio
>> >>
>> >>> On 14 Oct 2015, at 14:17, Jia Zhai <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>> Would you please give an instruction about how to trigger
>> >>> bookkeeper-trunk-precommit-build
>> >>> <https://builds.apache.org/job/bookkeeper-trunk-precommit-build/958/
>> >?
>> >>>
>> >>> According to the handled Jira ticket, when a Jira ticket is marked as
>> >> "PATCH
>> >>> AVAILABLE", "hadoop QA" will trigger a build, It seems this is
>> automatic.
>> >>> But when I Marked BOOKKEEPER-876
>> >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-876> as "patch
>> >>> available", that build was not triggered.
>> >>> Is there any instruction on how to trigger this build?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks a lot.
>> >>> -Jia
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to