Sure, I simply would like to run mvn install from the project root and have a 
clean build. 

-Flavio

> On 25 Nov 2015, at 23:31, Sijie Guo <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Flavio:
> 
> bookkeeper-benchmark and hedwig is kind of flaky. for hedwig, let's resume
> the discussion that Ivan raised before. I'd suggest moving them to a
> contrib module.
> 
> I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-883 for
> bookkeeper-benchmark timeout. I marked it for 4.4.0 to not block 4.3.2.
> 
> what do you think?
> 
> - Sijie
> 
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> To make it clear, what are voting on precisely? I can't get a clean build
>> because of bookkeeper-benchmark and hedwig. Are we supposed to ignore the
>> failures of those projects and take only the result of bookkeeper-server?
>> If so, perhaps we should consider for next time not including those when we
>> run mvn install.
>> 
>> -Flavio
>> 
>>> On 17 Nov 2015, at 22:39, Matteo Merli <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> This is the second release candidate for Apache BookKeeper, version
>> 4.3.2.
>>> 
>>> It fixes the following issues:
>>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12333529&styleName=Html&projectId=12311293
>>> 
>>> *** Please download, test and vote by November 21th 2015, 10:00 GMT.
>>> 
>>> Note that we are voting upon the source (tag), binaries are provided for
>>> convenience.
>>> 
>>> Source and binary files:
>>> 
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bookkeeper/bookkeeper-4.3.2-candidate-1/
>>> 
>>> Maven staging repo:
>>> 
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebookkeeper-1009/
>>> 
>>> The tag to be voted upon:
>>> release-4.3.2 (86538192a08b8629e9c1487dcc9afae95a51705f)
>>> 
>>> BookKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/bookkeeper/KEYS
>>> 
>>> Please download the the source package, and follow the README to build
>>> and run a bookkeeper and hedwig service.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matteo
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to