[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15254712#comment-15254712
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on BOOKKEEPER-924:
-------------------------------------------

GitHub user jvrao opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/38

    BOOKKEEPER-924  Handle Spurious wakeups

    SyncCounter doesn't handle Spurious wakeups.
    Make use of CountDownLatch latch instead of native counter
    
    Signed-off-by: Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV) <[email protected]>

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/jvrao/bookkeeper bk_924

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/38.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #38
    
----
commit 74167b16aa9b2c87ee2c2001d5c6d5322036b6cd
Author: JV <[email protected]>
Date:   2016-04-22T18:00:22Z

    BOOKKEEPER-924  Handle Spurious wakeups
    
    SyncCounter doesn't handle Spurious wakeups.
    Make use of CountDownLatch latch instead of native counter
    
    Signed-off-by: Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV) <[email protected]>

----


> addEntry() is susceptible to spurious wakeups
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-924
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-924
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
>            Assignee: Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
>            Priority: Critical
>
> LedgerHandle sync interface heavily depends on SyncCounter to convert async 
> interfaces
> into sync interfaces.
> Usaylly
> SyncCounter.inc()
> asyncCall()
> SyncCOunter.block(0)
> The block code is.
>    synchronized void block(int limit) throws InterruptedException {
>         while (i > limit) {
>             int prev = i;
>             wait();
>             if (i == prev) {
>                 break;
>             }
>         }
>     }
> Since 'i' is going to be same as 'prev' on spurious wakeup, and wait() can 
> return on spurious wakeups. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to