Hi Rithin, The proposal looks good to me. I have a few comments:
- How will the BookieInfo structure look like? - I like the idea of a general GET_BOOKIE_INFO request. Do you have any proposed wire protocol changes? - I assume that you might need the clients to configure a function to compute the weight for a bookie, right? So we can also compute the weight based on network bandwidth? - How does bookie collect the resource information? - Sijie On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Rithin Shetty <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sijie, > > I've updated the proposal page now: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/ > BP-2+-+Resource+aware+data+placement. > Sorry about the delay. > > Thanks, > --Rithin > > On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Sijie Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > As a reminder, we will be discussing the resource aware placement at the > > meeting next week. > > > > Rithin, do you mind updating the proposal by next Tue? so we have time to > > check before the meeting. > > > > - Sijie > > > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Sijie Guo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/BP-2+ > > > -+Resource+aware+data+placement > > > > > > I created a wiki page for place holder. Anyone that is interested in > this > > > topic can help fill a basic proposal and drive the discussion? > > > > > > *Problem* > > > > > > There are bunch of tickets around talking about placement policy : > > > - handle different types of storage (tier storage) > > > - handle storage node having different type of resources (resource > aware) > > > - better to canary/bucket-testing new version (manageability) > > > > > > It would be good to consolidate these thoughts to provide a common > > > framework/solution to meet those basic requirements. > > > > > > *Proposal* > > > > > > [TBD] > > > > > > - Sijie > > > > > > > > >
