Thanks for pushing this through, Sijie. I have a couple of concerns about this proposal:
1- There is a proposal, but I'm not seeing a workflow defined for github issues. Should we define one and make that part of the vote? 2- I'm not sure what the binding votes are and what the approval process is. Are we following the project bylaws here? Thanks, -Flavio > On 01 Jun 2017, at 21:59, Sijie Guo <guosi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Per the community meeting > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2017-06-01+Meeting+notes> > this morning, JV proposed to start use Github issues for issue tracking for > a few months and see how does it work out. I am starting this email thread > to vote for this. > > The vote will be: > > - Start using Github issues/pull requests for issue tracking for 3 months. > - During this 3 months, we will continue using both JIRA and Github issues. > - After 3 months, if the community decides whether we should continue using > Github issues or moving from JIRA to Github issues. (The final decision > will be a separate vote in 3 months) > > Please vote +1 if in favor of trying out Github issues and -1 if not. > > See below thread and community meeting notes > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/2017-06-01+Meeting+notes> > for reference: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/bookkeeper-dev/201705.mbox/%3CCAO2yDyYKmUiSfGfkGCKtfP8mmQtcJubGoMO-KsWsjM9_3pOd0Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E > > - Sijie
