Alex,

Take a look at https://github.com/rdowner/brooklyn-docs/tree/release-docs-update

I'll get started on the release tomorrow (I'll be in the office so
I'll have a phat pipe for uploading all those artifacts!) but feel
free to branch off 0.9.* now.

Richard.


On 29 March 2016 at 13:20, Alex Heneveld
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Richard-
>
> Nice.  Will hang fire on that.
>
> --A
>
>
>
> On 29/03/2016 10:50, Richard Downer wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> No objection to you making branches just now, but if you could hold
>> off for a little while, later today I'll push my "beta" updated
>> release docs with the branching instructions, and you can try them
>> out!
>>
>> I'll then kick off a release, probably tomorrow.
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>>
>> On 28 March 2016 at 16:08, Alex Heneveld
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Richard/All-
>>>
>>> Is the Easter bunny bringing us a release?
>>>
>>> The SoftLayer same-vlan PR is now in.  I think that was the last one.
>>>
>>> There are a lot of OSGi PR's but I think it would be best to merge these
>>> post-090.  Does anyone object to branching an 09x from which we can do a
>>> release and bumping master to 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT ?
>>>
>>> If no objection I will branch and bump the version tomorrow.
>>>
>>> And please ping me if I can help with a release.
>>>
>>> Best
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>
>>> On 15/03/2016 14:37, Richard Downer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> All,
>>>>
>>>> It's about time we had a new release of Apache Brooklyn - our first as
>>>> a graduated TLP. We have lots of great new features to share :-)
>>>>
>>>> Is there anything that we know about that would block a release?
>>>>
>>>> Are there any outstanding or imminent PRs that would be highly
>>>> desirable for a release?
>>>>
>>>> If we're in a good position it'd be great to get this kicked off in
>>>> the next day or two. I've been going over the release scripts and
>>>> documentation and fixing them for our TLP status, multiple new repos
>>>> and our new distributable artifacts and I think I'm just about ready
>>>> to push the "release candidate" button, if we think that the project
>>>> is in a releasable state?
>>>>
>>>> Richard.
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to