I've reviewed and tested John's brooklyn-dist PR #31: looks good, so
merged into master and 0.9.0.
---
As discussed offline, in the vote email we'll want to include checksums
of the individual brooklyn-client artifacts. This is because we want to
include them as individually downloadable artifacts, so that someone
visiting [1] can download the specific cli binary for their platform
(rather than having to download the zip of all of them, unzip it, and
then get the right artifact).
Richard: over to you to make sure we comply with Apache for this, and to
produce the next release candidate.
Aled
[1] http://brooklyn.apache.org/download/index.html
On 06/04/2016 18:31, Aled Sage wrote:
Thanks Sam,
That is now cherry-picked into 0.9.0. Agree it is low-risk and worth
including.
---
Can someone please review and test John's
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-dist/pull/31? It looks low risk and
simple.
Aled
On 06/04/2016 17:29, Sam Corbett wrote:
If I've not missed the cutoff I'd like
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/99 to be included.
On 6 April 2016 at 17:19, Richard Downer <rich...@apache.org> wrote:
On 6 April 2016 at 17:17, Aled Sage <aled.s...@gmail.com> wrote:
I believe that Richard is discussing which Geoff about which
brooklyn-client
platform artifacts are required. Once that is agreed and sorted,
then I
think we are good to go.
I've checked Geoff's PR and it's nice and simple: Mac 64bit, Windows
and Linux 32bit. The 32bit executables execute on 64bit machines so
there's no benefit to 64bit artifacts. To the best of my knowledge
there has never been a 32-bit Intel-based Mac, and even if there was,
it's obsolete.
So it's ready to go IMO.
