Thanks Aled. I'm kicking off rc3 just now. Richard.
On 6 April 2016 at 20:43, Aled Sage <[email protected]> wrote: > I've reviewed and tested John's brooklyn-dist PR #31: looks good, so merged > into master and 0.9.0. > > --- > As discussed offline, in the vote email we'll want to include checksums of > the individual brooklyn-client artifacts. This is because we want to include > them as individually downloadable artifacts, so that someone visiting [1] > can download the specific cli binary for their platform (rather than having > to download the zip of all of them, unzip it, and then get the right > artifact). > > Richard: over to you to make sure we comply with Apache for this, and to > produce the next release candidate. > > Aled > > [1] http://brooklyn.apache.org/download/index.html > > > > On 06/04/2016 18:31, Aled Sage wrote: >> >> Thanks Sam, >> >> That is now cherry-picked into 0.9.0. Agree it is low-risk and worth >> including. >> >> --- >> Can someone please review and test John's >> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-dist/pull/31? It looks low risk and >> simple. >> >> Aled >> >> >> On 06/04/2016 17:29, Sam Corbett wrote: >>> >>> If I've not missed the cutoff I'd like >>> https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/99 to be included. >>> >>> On 6 April 2016 at 17:19, Richard Downer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On 6 April 2016 at 17:17, Aled Sage <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I believe that Richard is discussing which Geoff about which >>>> >>>> brooklyn-client >>>>> >>>>> platform artifacts are required. Once that is agreed and sorted, then I >>>>> think we are good to go. >>>> >>>> I've checked Geoff's PR and it's nice and simple: Mac 64bit, Windows >>>> and Linux 32bit. The 32bit executables execute on 64bit machines so >>>> there's no benefit to 64bit artifacts. To the best of my knowledge >>>> there has never been a 32-bit Intel-based Mac, and even if there was, >>>> it's obsolete. >>>> >>>> So it's ready to go IMO. >>>> >> >
