I've backported these remaining ones.  Made sense to inclue #53 also.

I've also taken the doc backports made to 090 and applied them to 09x. (It is nice how 09x builds on 090 so we can do a straightforward merge, to which I've added a comment explaining the backports so if you use the graphical log view -- sometimes `git l` -- it will all be clear. But we should remember to do this again if we cut an 091!)

@Thomas - yes test entities are in 090 so I've included #55

--A


On 13/05/2016 12:38, Thomas Bouron wrote:
Apologies Richard.

#54 applies to 0.9.0
#55 not sure, do the test entities have been introduced in 0.9.0?

On Fri, 13 May 2016, 12:17 Alex Heneveld, <[email protected]>
wrote:

sorry, remaining ones should be:

#52 [bostko]
#54 [tbouron]
#55 [tbouron]


On 13 May 2016 at 13:17, Alex Heneveld <[email protected]>
wrote:

#53 can be skipped i think --- remaining list:

#52 [bostko]
#54 [tbouron]
#55 [tbouron]
#56 [neykov]

--a



On 13/05/2016 12:07, Svetoslav Neykov wrote:

Same for #56 [neykov]

Svet.


On 13.05.2016 г., at 14:06, Svetoslav Neykov <
[email protected]> wrote:

#44 [neykov]
#49 [neykov]

Both apply to master only.

Svet.



On 13.05.2016 г., at 13:53, Richard Downer <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks Sam - and Duncan Godwin and David Bush who also revised their
PRs.

Remaining list is here - can people please confirm if these PRs need
to
be
retrospectively applied to the 0.9.0 user guide, or if they only
affect
later versions and/or website content only.

#44 [neykov]
#49 [neykov]
#52 [bostko]
#53 [ahgittin]
#54 [tbouron]
#55 [tbouron]
#56 [neykov]

Thanks
Richard.

On 13 May 2016 at 10:57, Sam Corbett <[email protected]>
wrote:

#43 [sjcorbett] - resubmitted
#45 [sjcorbett] - only for 0.10.0 onwards
#48 [sjcorbett] - only affects
https://brooklyn.apache.org/learnmore/catalog/




On 10/05/2016 17:12, Richard Downer wrote:

All,
If you have made a PR against brooklyn-docs which is to fix an issue
in
the
0.9.0 documentation - and you need it to be visible in the
"/v/latest"
docs
- please could you re-submit your PR against branch `0.9.0`.

Here are the PRs that may be affected - if this is yours, please
could you
check if it needs to be re-submitted for 0.9.0. If you don't have
time to
make a new PR yourself, please at least indicate if it needs to be
done or
not, and somebody else can do it.

Merged PRs:
#40 [drigodwin]
#41 [drigodwin]
#42 [drigodwin]
#43 [sjcorbett]
#44 [neykov]
#45 [sjcorbett]
#48 [sjcorbett]
#49 [neykov]
#50 [f377isB]
#51 [drigodwin]
#52 [bostko]
#53 [ahgittin]
#54 [tbouron]
#55 [tbouron]

Open PRs:
#56 [neykov]
#57 [drigodwin]

Thanks
Richard.




Reply via email to