Thanks Alex! Are you going to push to the svn website too or should I do
that? (I have it checked out and up-to-date)

Richard.


On 13 May 2016 at 13:06, Alex Heneveld <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
> I've backported these remaining ones.  Made sense to inclue #53 also.
>
> I've also taken the doc backports made to 090 and applied them to 09x.
> (It is nice how 09x builds on 090 so we can do a straightforward merge, to
> which I've added a comment explaining the backports so if you use the
> graphical log view -- sometimes `git l` -- it will all be clear.  But we
> should remember to do this again if we cut an 091!)
>
> @Thomas - yes test entities are in 090 so I've included #55
>
> --A
>
>
>
> On 13/05/2016 12:38, Thomas Bouron wrote:
>
>> Apologies Richard.
>>
>> #54 applies to 0.9.0
>> #55 not sure, do the test entities have been introduced in 0.9.0?
>>
>> On Fri, 13 May 2016, 12:17 Alex Heneveld, <
>> [email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> sorry, remaining ones should be:
>>>
>>> #52 [bostko]
>>> #54 [tbouron]
>>> #55 [tbouron]
>>>
>>>
>>> On 13 May 2016 at 13:17, Alex Heneveld <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> #53 can be skipped i think --- remaining list:
>>>>
>>>> #52 [bostko]
>>>> #54 [tbouron]
>>>> #55 [tbouron]
>>>> #56 [neykov]
>>>>
>>>> --a
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 13/05/2016 12:07, Svetoslav Neykov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Same for #56 [neykov]
>>>>>
>>>>> Svet.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 13.05.2016 г., at 14:06, Svetoslav Neykov <
>>>>>
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> #44 [neykov]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #49 [neykov]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Both apply to master only.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Svet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 13.05.2016 г., at 13:53, Richard Downer <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Sam - and Duncan Godwin and David Bush who also revised their
>>>>>>> PRs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Remaining list is here - can people please confirm if these PRs need
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> to
>>>
>>>> be
>>>>>>> retrospectively applied to the 0.9.0 user guide, or if they only
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> affect
>>>
>>>> later versions and/or website content only.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #44 [neykov]
>>>>>>> #49 [neykov]
>>>>>>> #52 [bostko]
>>>>>>> #53 [ahgittin]
>>>>>>> #54 [tbouron]
>>>>>>> #55 [tbouron]
>>>>>>> #56 [neykov]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Richard.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 13 May 2016 at 10:57, Sam Corbett <[email protected]>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #43 [sjcorbett] - resubmitted
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> #45 [sjcorbett] - only for 0.10.0 onwards
>>>>>>>> #48 [sjcorbett] - only affects
>>>>>>>> https://brooklyn.apache.org/learnmore/catalog/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10/05/2016 17:12, Richard Downer wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you have made a PR against brooklyn-docs which is to fix an
>>>>>>>>> issue
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> 0.9.0 documentation - and you need it to be visible in the
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "/v/latest"
>>>
>>>> docs
>>>>>>>>> - please could you re-submit your PR against branch `0.9.0`.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here are the PRs that may be affected - if this is yours, please
>>>>>>>>> could you
>>>>>>>>> check if it needs to be re-submitted for 0.9.0. If you don't have
>>>>>>>>> time to
>>>>>>>>> make a new PR yourself, please at least indicate if it needs to be
>>>>>>>>> done or
>>>>>>>>> not, and somebody else can do it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Merged PRs:
>>>>>>>>> #40 [drigodwin]
>>>>>>>>> #41 [drigodwin]
>>>>>>>>> #42 [drigodwin]
>>>>>>>>> #43 [sjcorbett]
>>>>>>>>> #44 [neykov]
>>>>>>>>> #45 [sjcorbett]
>>>>>>>>> #48 [sjcorbett]
>>>>>>>>> #49 [neykov]
>>>>>>>>> #50 [f377isB]
>>>>>>>>> #51 [drigodwin]
>>>>>>>>> #52 [bostko]
>>>>>>>>> #53 [ahgittin]
>>>>>>>>> #54 [tbouron]
>>>>>>>>> #55 [tbouron]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Open PRs:
>>>>>>>>> #56 [neykov]
>>>>>>>>> #57 [drigodwin]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> Richard.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>

Reply via email to