+1, prefer separate repo, though. Robert
On 9 September 2016 at 10:03, Andrea Turli <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to move `rest/rest-client` out of `brooklyn-server` > > brooklyn-server has a dependency on resteasy which is used only by the > rest/rest-client module. Having resteasy and cxf (two jax-rs > implementations) in the classpath looks redundant to me. > Also the extra work needed to support osgi bundles for both. Notice > also jaxrs implementation are not really osgi friendly (ask > @googlielmo and @neykov for more details :P) > > So I think a diet for brooklyn-server is not a bad thing :) > > Said that, we are discussing with @geomacy > (https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/25) if > `brooklyn-client` is the right new place for moving the rest java > client. > > We'd like to have more devs involved in this discussion, is it better > moving the java client to `brooklyn-client` (option1) or create a new > project (option2), say `brooklyn-java-client` or > `brooklyn-rest-clients` maybe? Else (option3)? > > Thanks, > Andrea >
