Robert, thanks for your feedback!
Alex, https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/25 implements ``` brooklyn-client/ cli/ **/*.go java/ src/main/java/**/*.java ``` Happy to change it to whatever you guys prefer (Alex's option 2 or option 3) Personally, I like ``` brooklyn-client-cli/ **/*.go brooklyn-client-bindings/ java/ src/main/java/**/*.java ``` although renaming `brooklyn-client` to `brooklyn-client-cli` could be distracting. Andrea On 9 September 2016 at 11:54, Alex Heneveld <alex.henev...@cloudsoftcorp.com> wrote: > > i lean towards this: > > brooklyn-client/ > cli/ > **/*.go > java/ > src/main/java/**/*.java > > or > > brooklyn-client/ > cli/ > **/*.go > bindings/ > java/ > src/main/java/**/*.java > > but I could live with this: > > brooklyn-client-cli/ > **/*.go > brooklyn-client-bindings/ > java/ > src/main/java/**/*.java > > reason for preferring a single client project is to keep the top-level list > of brooklyn sub-projects tighter (server and client has a nice symmetry ... > and given how much larger server is than all the clients, it'd be odd and > distracting to have multiple client projects) > > --a > > > > On 09/09/2016 10:17, Robert Moss wrote: >> >> +1, prefer separate repo, though. >> >> Robert >> >> On 9 September 2016 at 10:03, Andrea Turli >> <andrea.tu...@cloudsoftcorp.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'd like to move `rest/rest-client` out of `brooklyn-server` >>> >>> brooklyn-server has a dependency on resteasy which is used only by the >>> rest/rest-client module. Having resteasy and cxf (two jax-rs >>> implementations) in the classpath looks redundant to me. >>> Also the extra work needed to support osgi bundles for both. Notice >>> also jaxrs implementation are not really osgi friendly (ask >>> @googlielmo and @neykov for more details :P) >>> >>> So I think a diet for brooklyn-server is not a bad thing :) >>> >>> Said that, we are discussing with @geomacy >>> (https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-client/pull/25) if >>> `brooklyn-client` is the right new place for moving the rest java >>> client. >>> >>> We'd like to have more devs involved in this discussion, is it better >>> moving the java client to `brooklyn-client` (option1) or create a new >>> project (option2), say `brooklyn-java-client` or >>> `brooklyn-rest-clients` maybe? Else (option3)? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Andrea >>> >
