GitHub user aledsage opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/469

    Remove net.java.dev.jna dependency exclusion

    jclouds now correctly imports the dual-licensed version of jna, 
    so we can rely on that rather than excluding it ourselves.
    
    See 
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/commit/b3882cbfed873a5975d4918d1fb8b836b544c421.
 This is definitely in jclouds 1.9.2. (and 1.9.3 as well): see 
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/blob/rel/jclouds-1.9.2/drivers/sshj/pom.xml#L110.
    
    With this change, looking at `mvn dependency:tree -Dverbose` includes the 
output below, and shows that the only "jna" dependencies are version 4.1.0.
    
    ```
    [INFO] |     +- com.jcraft:jsch.agentproxy.usocket-jna:jar:0.0.8:compile
    [INFO] |     |  +- net.java.dev.jna:jna:jar:4.1.0:compile
    [INFO] |     |  \- net.java.dev.jna:jna-platform:jar:4.1.0:compile
    [INFO] |     |     \- (net.java.dev.jna:jna:jar:4.1.0:compile - omitted for 
duplicate)
    ```
    
    It also confirms that `jna` and `jna-platform` don't pull in any other 
transitive dependencies, so the upgrade from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0 shouldn't cause any 
problems (it just brings us in line with the versions that were actually tested 
in the jclouds releases!).

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/aledsage/brooklyn-server 
tidy-dependency-net.java.dev.jna

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/469.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #469
    
----

----


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to