Github user aledsage commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/484#discussion_r93065657
  
    --- Diff: 
locations/jclouds/src/main/java/org/apache/brooklyn/location/jclouds/templates/customize/CustomizeTemplateOptions2.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
    + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
    + * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
    + * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
    + * specific language governing permissions and limitations
    + * under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.brooklyn.location.jclouds.templates.customize;
    +
    +// Has "2" in its name so JcloudsLocation can use it without having to use 
a fully qualified reference.
    +public class CustomizeTemplateOptions2 {
    --- End diff --
    
    Unfortunate that `CustomizeTemplateOptions` is already taken. I don't like 
the "2" in the name, but not sure what to suggest that would be better (unless 
we can delete the existing interface `CustomizeTemplateOptions`).
    
    I don't think the interface `JcloudsLocation.CustomizeTemplateOptions` will 
be mentioned in any persisted state, so deleting it is just about source-level 
compatibility with anything that uses it directly. I lean towards treating that 
as a part of our "internal" API, so deleting it. It should be easy to fix any 
downstream projects that then fail to compile.
    
    We'd then use the nicer name of `CustomizeTemplateOptions` for this class.
    
    @sjcorbett Thoughts?


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to