Github user ahgittin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/338
As for `catalogItemId`, I think we should continue to populate and persist
this. It is useful to know from whence something came, and for audit purposes
this will become even more important: e.g. which version is it running. I
realize for persistence purposes we can get the exact same class back using the
search paths, but we want to be able to find instances of `item:1.0` e.g. so we
can upgrade them to `item:2.0`, and I think without the `catalogItemId` field
we won't be able to do that. WDYT?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
