Hi all. Massive +1 Alex. I also think we can hugely improve the website from a UI/UX perspective. Valentin also raises a good point about the SEO which is far from being optimised.
I would happily help on that. Best. On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 at 15:32 Alex Heneveld <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi folks- > > I've been hearing two categories of feedback from people who've spent > time on our website: "I don't get it" and "Sounds complicated". > > I think the time is right for us to fix this. We can give a clear, > gentle experience, and we can tone down the academic ideas in favour of > real examples, which thanks to recent improvements are pretty simple. > I'm thinking of a few changes: > > * Expand and ground the landing page (currently it's all academic theory > words words words) -- I attach a mock-up of how this could look in the > attached (based on other sites) > * Rework the Getting Started example to be something using bash, rather > than a magic java entity > * Instead of YAML/Java blueprints, call it "Basic Blueprints" "Advanced > Blueprinting", make the "Basic Blueprints" section nice simpler > reference pages, with much of the content moved into advanced (where the > Java items might get buried further) > > What do other people think? Should we have a chat? Say next Fri 4pm UK ? > > Best > Alex > > -- Thomas Bouron • Senior Software Engineer @ Cloudsoft Corporation • https://cloudsoft.io/ Github: https://github.com/tbouron Twitter: https://twitter.com/eltibouron
