+1 on Thomas's mock up, looks great.

Being able to see something in action before trying it can be useful,
perhaps something asciinema-like (https://asciinema.org/a/46498).

On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 at 08:21 Thomas Bouron <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 at 00:32 Alex Heneveld <
> [email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Wow - really like this!  Very clean and elegant.
> >
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> > I think we should /show/ a little bit more what we mean by
> > modeling/deploying/managing -- eg for modelling (code snippet), and a
> > graphic w cloud icons for deploy, and maybe a UI screenshot for manage ?
> >
>
> I'm not sure I agree with that. I deliberately went for less because I
> believe less is more, especially on the homepage. Adding a code snippet,
> screenshots abd logos will do the reverse IMO. You started this thread by
> saying that Brooklyn is always considered as complicated, doing this will
> reinforce this feeling IMO.
>
> That being said, we could add a page to have a UI tour, with a link to it
> in the "Get Started" menu item?
>
>
> > And not sure about curl-to-bash for install -- some people are
> > uncomfortable with that (in any case we should curl from an apache site
> > for a release, not github).
>
>
> I used github as an example, this is not a real URL.
>
>
> > But some one-line quick start would be
> > nice.  A docker image?  (And can say jump to Get Started for other
> > flavours of installs.)
> >
>
> Why not for the docker image. I went for the curl command because that's
> the only one that does not require the user to install anything else. If
> you think about it, a quick start guide that starts by "Install docker" or
> "Install vagrant AND VirtualBox" is far from a great way to start for a
> first-time Brooklyn user. Now I might be wrong about this and if it is the
> case, then I'm happy to change it (again, that's just a prototype)
> Regarding the other flavours of install, it's specified in a link, below
> the shell command ;)
>
> Lastly instead of the brooklyn logo font, can you just use the big logo
> > PNG that is currently in use on the site?
>
>
> I could do that but:
>
>    1. the quality is not as nice as pure text
>    2. from an semantic/SEO point of view, it's better to use the text as
>    crawler will be able to read it
>
> Also, I don't know if you noticed but I rearranged the menu items. I was
> planning to do this + update all the web dependencies i.e. bootstrap,
> jquery, etc
>
> Best
> --
>
> Thomas Bouron • Senior Software Engineer @ Cloudsoft Corporation •
> https://cloudsoft.io/
> Github: https://github.com/tbouron
> Twitter: https://twitter.com/eltibouron
>

Reply via email to