Hi all, The licences have been updated in [1].
Richard is the next step a vote by the community to see if this is actually wanted within brooklyn? Cheers Mark [1] https://github.com/cloudsoft/brooklyn-container-service/ On 20 May 2017 at 18:35, Andrew Kennedy <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi. > > The code in the repository [0] looks good to me, but obviously the > licensing terms need changed, and the standard ASF license header [1] added > to the Java files. Do we need this to happen before the IP can be voted on > and accepted? > > Cheers, > Andrew. > > 0. https://github.com/cloudsoft/brooklyn-container-service > 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > > On Tue, 16 May 2017 at 16:35 Mark McKenna <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > The container service code that will be contributed is available here [1] > > > > [1] https://github.com/cloudsoft/brooklyn-container-service > > > > > > Regards > > Mark > > > > On 10 May 2017 at 20:53, Richard Downer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Aled, > > > > > > > > > On 10 May 2017 at 17:22, Aled Sage <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > +1; sounds great. > > > > > > > > I think the next steps would be for the code to be made publicly > > viewable, > > > > for any 3rd party licenses etc to be checked, and then for us to kick > > off a > > > > formal vote? > > > > > > > > > > We are at the technical assessment stage - establishing if this is > > > something we want in Apache Brooklyn, etc. In the mean time, Cloudsoft > > will > > > almost certainly want to audit their existing source code to make sure > it > > > is suitable for public consumption (e.g. does not contain any > proprietary > > > code which Cloudsoft are not at liberty to relicense, commits do not > > > contain references to their customers or other confidential > information, > > > etc.) and then share their code somewhere; then we can figure out if it > > > will integrate into our codebase and if so where. > > > > > > > > > > Richard: can you please guide us on the process? > > > > > > > > > Sure - the formal process, after Brooklyn has voted to accept it, is > > > described at [1]. It has to be executed by either an Officer or a > Member > > of > > > the ASF - I am both, so the process can be summarised as "I will take > > care > > > of it" :-) > > > > > > We and Cloudsoft have done this twice before (once for the Brooklyn > CLI, > > > and once for the CAMP Server), so I don't expect any problems. > Cloudsoft > > > will need to complete a legal Software Grant Agreement, so I'll need > > > assistance from Cloudsoft management, but it shouldn't be too onerous. > > > > > > Richard. > > > > > > [1]https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance- > template.html > > > > > > -- > > Andrew Kennedy ; Founder clocker.io project ; @grkvlt ; Cloudsoft > -- *Mark McKenna* *twitter:* @m4rkmckenna <https://twitter.com/m4rkmckenna> * pgp:* A7A9 24DE 638C 681A 8DEA FAD4 2B5D C759 B1EB 76A7 <https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B5DC759B1EB76A7>
