Yes, The next step is a vote, and then I am happy to go through the IP clearance process [0][1] (as Richard did for the CLI [2] etc contributions) as it must be done by a PMC member. I'll do this (unless anyone objects) once the vote is proposed and passes...
Andrew. 0. http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ 1. http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.xml 2. http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/brooklyn-cli.html On Thu, 25 May 2017 at 06:50 Mark McKenna <mark.mcke...@cloudsoft.io> wrote: > Hi all, > > The licences have been updated in [1]. > > Richard is the next step a vote by the community to see if this is actually > wanted within brooklyn? > > Cheers > Mark > > [1] https://github.com/cloudsoft/brooklyn-container-service/ > > On 20 May 2017 at 18:35, Andrew Kennedy <andrew.kenn...@cloudsoftcorp.com> > wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > The code in the repository [0] looks good to me, but obviously the > > licensing terms need changed, and the standard ASF license header [1] > added > > to the Java files. Do we need this to happen before the IP can be voted > on > > and accepted? > > > > Cheers, > > Andrew. > > > > 0. https://github.com/cloudsoft/brooklyn-container-service > > 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html > > > > On Tue, 16 May 2017 at 16:35 Mark McKenna <mark.mcke...@cloudsoft.io> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > The container service code that will be contributed is available here > [1] > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/cloudsoft/brooklyn-container-service > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > Mark > > > > > > On 10 May 2017 at 20:53, Richard Downer <rich...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Aled, > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10 May 2017 at 17:22, Aled Sage <aled.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1; sounds great. > > > > > > > > > > I think the next steps would be for the code to be made publicly > > > viewable, > > > > > for any 3rd party licenses etc to be checked, and then for us to > kick > > > off a > > > > > formal vote? > > > > > > > > > > > > > We are at the technical assessment stage - establishing if this is > > > > something we want in Apache Brooklyn, etc. In the mean time, > Cloudsoft > > > will > > > > almost certainly want to audit their existing source code to make > sure > > it > > > > is suitable for public consumption (e.g. does not contain any > > proprietary > > > > code which Cloudsoft are not at liberty to relicense, commits do not > > > > contain references to their customers or other confidential > > information, > > > > etc.) and then share their code somewhere; then we can figure out if > it > > > > will integrate into our codebase and if so where. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Richard: can you please guide us on the process? > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure - the formal process, after Brooklyn has voted to accept it, is > > > > described at [1]. It has to be executed by either an Officer or a > > Member > > > of > > > > the ASF - I am both, so the process can be summarised as "I will take > > > care > > > > of it" :-) > > > > > > > > We and Cloudsoft have done this twice before (once for the Brooklyn > > CLI, > > > > and once for the CAMP Server), so I don't expect any problems. > > Cloudsoft > > > > will need to complete a legal Software Grant Agreement, so I'll need > > > > assistance from Cloudsoft management, but it shouldn't be too > onerous. > > > > > > > > Richard. > > > > > > > > [1]https://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance- > > template.html > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Andrew Kennedy ; Founder clocker.io project ; @grkvlt ; Cloudsoft > > > > > > -- > > *Mark McKenna* > > *twitter:* @m4rkmckenna <https://twitter.com/m4rkmckenna> > > * pgp:* A7A9 24DE 638C 681A 8DEA FAD4 2B5D C759 B1EB 76A7 > <https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x2B5DC759B1EB76A7> > -- Andrew Kennedy ; Founder clocker.io project ; @grkvlt ; Cloudsoft
