Github user ahgittin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-server/pull/718
in `SpecConverter`, if the catalog item ID is set i think that implies the
java type so we _could_ skip writing and _should_ ignore it (just use the
catalog item ID) when reading. that would solve the problem identified here.
a different solution would be to make sure the CLC for `foo-wrapped`
includes bundles declared in ancestor types. that's probably (?) wanted in any
case, so feels like we should do both of these.
those are quicker, necessary, and independent fixes instead of the
suggestion in the previous post about the wider osgi serialization approach.
(that approach should also look at comments in `ClassRenamingMapper` about
unifying it with `OsgiClassnameMapper`; and a related improvement is for the
search path to refer to bundles.)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
