OK. I will build rc3 after all problems are solved. tan zhongyi <[email protected]> 于2019年8月29日周四 下午7:22写道：
> Thanks， tangjie， > > It seems that we have missed some third-party's file, > We need to check them again. > > -1 , vote closed as not Go. > > @JiashunZhu, we need to check these files one by one and build rc3 later. > > BTW: JB, please cancel your investigation and focus on the next rc3 > release , thanks > > > 在 2019/8/29 下午2:02，“Tang,Jie(EE)”<[email protected]> 写入: > > A list of 30 files without license header, including CPP and shell, > was compiled by Rat tool. > > 1. Rat tool will have false alarms and do some filtering work. > > 2. Makefile, markdown file, refer to other Apache projects without > license, there is no license. > > This is files list: > build_in_travis_ci.sh > config_brpc.sh > example/multi_threaded_echo_fns_c++/random_kill.sh > src/brpc/callback.h > src/bthread/context.cpp > src/bthread/context.h > src/brpc/details/tcmalloc_extension.cpp > src/butil/linux_magic.h > src/butil/intrusive_ptr.hpp > src/butil/recordio.cc > src/butil/third_party/modp_b64/modp_b64_data.h > src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/biginteger.h > src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/diyfp.h > src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/dtoa.h > src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/ieee754.h > src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/itoa.h > src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/meta.h > src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/pow10.h > src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/stack.h > src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/strfunc.h > src/butil/third_party/rapidjson/internal/strtod.h > src/butil/unique_ptr.h > test/bthread_sched_yield_unittest.cpp > test/file_watcher_unittest.cpp > test/recordio_unittest.cpp > test/run_tests.sh > test/string_splitter_unittest.cpp > tools/add_syntax_equal_proto2_to_all.sh > tools/print_gcc_version.cc > tools/rpc_press/client.py > > 在 2019/8/14 下午9:46，“tan zhongyi”<[email protected]> 写入: > > > > Hi, guys, > > > > > > another round of vote begins > > > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of apache > brpc(incubating) 0.9.6-rc02. > > > The source code can be found at: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.6-rc02/apache-brpc-0.9.6.rc02-incubating-src.tar.gz > > > The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 0.9.6-rc01, > available here: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/0.9.6-rc02 > > The SHA-512 checksum is: > > cd737f4cc9c69cd15d58fbee0d64f14383ef0dc5727b74e2c1bdcec95fcaa1fad4d8e31fa9341931722552231f5b38aa5acfb5558007a03cc6b77f3c4b20c611 > > which can be found via: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.6-rc02/apache-brpc-0.9.6.rc02-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha512 > > > > > > The signature can be found via: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/0.9.6-rc02/apache-brpc-0.9.6.rc02-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc > > > > KEYS file is available here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS > > > > > > [Release Note] > > > > * Health (of a connection) can be checked at rpc-level > * Fix SSL-related compilation issues on Mac > * Support SSL-replacement lib MesaLink > * Support consistent hashing with ketama algo. > * bvar variables can be exported for prometheus services > * String[Multi]Splitter supports '\0' as separator > * Support for bilibili discovery service > * Improved CircuitBreaker > * grpc impl. supports timeout > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as: > > Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.6-rc02 > > > > This vote will be open until “Fri Oct 19 2019 00:00:00 GMT+0800 > (CST)" and > > passes if a majority of at least three +1 Apache brpc IPMC votes > are > > cast. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package > > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > > Checklist for reference: > [ ]Are release files in correct location? > [ ]Do release files have the word incubating in their name? > [ ] Are the digital signature and hashes correct? > [ ] Does DISCLAIMER file exist? > [ ]Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists? > [ ] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct? > [ ] Is the NOTICE year correct? > [ ] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE > or NOTICE? > [ ] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE? > Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so: > [ ] Does the software have a compatible license? > [ ] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE? > [ ] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in > LICENSE? > Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If > so: > [ ]Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this > NOTICE file? > [ ]Do all source files have ASF headers? > [ ] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in > version control? > [ ] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release? > [ ] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear? > > > > > Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers, > please > > feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your votes. > > Thanks > > > > > -- Jiashun Zhu
