looks good to me. you can go on with it. On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:58 AM Lorin Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, guys, > > > > (This is a DRAFT for releasing Apache brpc(incubating) 1.0.0-rc01, not a > real voting email. If you have any questions about the released package or > release notes, feel free to leave a comment. I will modify the contents and > then send another formal voting email.) > > > > 1.0.0-rc01 is ready for vote, here it is. > > > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of apache > brpc(incubating) 1.0.0-rc01. > > The source code can be found at: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/1.0.0-rc01/apache-brpc-1.0.0-rc01-incubating-src.tar.gz > > The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 1.0.0-rc01, available > here: > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/1.0.0-rc01 > > The SHA-512 checksum is: > > > decc05e36153182a0463b0dbd72f8e4cf8d41f165f2052ce043b25abd9b3907f65eb5a769a385338f14d3f73ff18b3bb0246811905603979fbb5a327cc1242a8 > > > > which can be found via: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/1.0.0-rc01/apache-brpc-1.0.0-rc01-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha512 > > The signature can be found via: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/1.0.0-rc01/apache-brpc-1.0.0-rc01-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc > > KEYS file is available here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS > > [Release Note] > > - Fix a latency issue caused by event_dispatcher > - Fix bug that time unit is not listed in grpc timeout options > - Fix heap overflow in simple_data_pool > - Support the length of redis args could be zero > - Fix bug that may throw out of index in rpc_replay > - Fix an access-after-return issue in TimerThread > > Please vote on releasing this package as: > > Apache brpc(incubating) 1.0.0-rc01 > > This vote will be open until “Mon Aug 5 2021 00:00:00 GMT+0800 (CST)" and > > passes if a majority of Apache brpc IPMC ( at least three +1 ) votes are > cast. > > [ ] +1 Release this package > > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because… > > Checklist for reference: > > [ ] Are release files in correct location? > > [ ] Do release files have the word incubating in their name? > > [ ] Are the digital signature and hashes correct? > > [ ] Does the DISCLAIMER file exist? > > [ ] Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exist? > > [ ] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct? > > [ ] Is the NOTICE year correct? > > [ ] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or > NOTICE? > > [ ] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE? > > [ ] Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so: > > [ ] Does the software have a compatible license? > > [ ] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE? > > [ ] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE? > > [ ] Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If so: > > [ ] Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE > file? > > [ ] Do all source files have ASF headers? > > [ ] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version > control? > > [ ] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release? > > [ ] Can you compile from source? Is the instruction clear? > > Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers, please > > feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your vote. > > > Thanks >
