Thanks a lot for Trista's reply, I have modified the email with her suggestion. Here is the newest version of the voting email, please take a look. Thanks!
(NOTICE: This is just a draft email) Hello Apache brpc(Incubating) Community, This is a call for vote to release Apache brpc version 1.0.0-rc01 [Release Note] - Fix a latency issue caused by event_dispatcher - Fix bug that time unit is not listed in grpc timeout options - Fix heap overflow in simple_data_pool - Support the length of redis args could be zero - Fix bug that may throw out of index in rpc_replay - Fix an access-after-return issue in TimerThread The release candidates: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/1.0.0-rc01/ Git tag for the release: https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/1.0.0-rc01 Release Commit ID: https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/commit/60f2a47c7271555c2fb0e3ecd798980f2fffe6ba Keys to verify the Release Candidate: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of votes are reached. Please vote accordingly: [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason PMC vote is +1 binding, all others is +1 non-binding. Checklist for reference: [ ] Download links are valid. [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid. [ ] Source code distributions have correct names matching the current release. [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each brpc repo. [ ] All files have license headers if necessary. [ ] No compiled archives bundled in source archive. Best Regards, LorinLee 谭中意 <[email protected]> 于2021年8月2日周一 上午9:55写道： > looks good to me. you can go on with it. > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:58 AM Lorin Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, guys, > > > > > > > > (This is a DRAFT for releasing Apache brpc(incubating) 1.0.0-rc01, not a > > real voting email. If you have any questions about the released package > or > > release notes, feel free to leave a comment. I will modify the contents > and > > then send another formal voting email.) > > > > > > > > 1.0.0-rc01 is ready for vote, here it is. > > > > > > > > I am pleased to be calling this vote for the release of apache > > brpc(incubating) 1.0.0-rc01. > > > > The source code can be found at: > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/1.0.0-rc01/apache-brpc-1.0.0-rc01-incubating-src.tar.gz > > > > The release candidate has been tagged in GitHub as 1.0.0-rc01, available > > here: > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-brpc/releases/tag/1.0.0-rc01 > > > > The SHA-512 checksum is: > > > > > > > decc05e36153182a0463b0dbd72f8e4cf8d41f165f2052ce043b25abd9b3907f65eb5a769a385338f14d3f73ff18b3bb0246811905603979fbb5a327cc1242a8 > > > > > > > > which can be found via: > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/1.0.0-rc01/apache-brpc-1.0.0-rc01-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha512 > > > > The signature can be found via: > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/1.0.0-rc01/apache-brpc-1.0.0-rc01-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc > > > > KEYS file is available here: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/brpc/KEYS > > > > [Release Note] > > > > - Fix a latency issue caused by event_dispatcher > > - Fix bug that time unit is not listed in grpc timeout options > > - Fix heap overflow in simple_data_pool > > - Support the length of redis args could be zero > > - Fix bug that may throw out of index in rpc_replay > > - Fix an access-after-return issue in TimerThread > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as: > > > > Apache brpc(incubating) 1.0.0-rc01 > > > > This vote will be open until “Mon Aug 5 2021 00:00:00 GMT+0800 (CST)" and > > > > passes if a majority of Apache brpc IPMC ( at least three +1 ) votes are > > cast. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package > > > > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but don't object > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because… > > > > Checklist for reference: > > > > [ ] Are release files in correct location? > > > > [ ] Do release files have the word incubating in their name? > > > > [ ] Are the digital signature and hashes correct? > > > > [ ] Does the DISCLAIMER file exist? > > > > [ ] Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exist? > > > > [ ] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct? > > > > [ ] Is the NOTICE year correct? > > > > [ ] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or > > NOTICE? > > > > [ ] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE? > > > > [ ] Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so: > > > > [ ] Does the software have a compatible license? > > > > [ ] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE? > > > > [ ] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE? > > > > [ ] Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If > so: > > > > [ ] Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this NOTICE > > file? > > > > [ ] Do all source files have ASF headers? > > > > [ ] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version > > control? > > > > [ ] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release? > > > > [ ] Can you compile from source? Is the instruction clear? > > > > Anyone can participate in testing and voting, not just committers, please > > > > feel free to try out the release candidate and provide your vote. > > > > > > Thanks > > >
