Fine by me and thanks for picking that up.

Alex

On Monday, May 31, 2010, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt <
pepijn.vaneeckho...@luciad.com> wrote:
> I've been going through the specs and up until now all failures are
related to utime not behaving as expected on windows. I'm changing the specs
so that they don't rely on utime but use sleeps instead. This makes the
specs much more reliable (se linux doesn't allow mtime to be set in the past
either IIRC), at the cost of slightly slower execution due to the sleeps. Is
this acceptable?
>
> Pepijn
>

Reply via email to