Fine by me and thanks for picking that up. Alex
On Monday, May 31, 2010, Pepijn Van Eeckhoudt <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been going through the specs and up until now all failures are related > to utime not behaving as expected on windows. I'm changing the specs so that > they don't rely on utime but use sleeps instead. This makes the specs much > more reliable (se linux doesn't allow mtime to be set in the past either > IIRC), at the cost of slightly slower execution due to the sleeps. Is this > acceptable? > > Pepijn >
