Alrighty then. I'm generally in favor of rapid releases myself, I just wanted to be sure that we weren't rushing things.
I vote +1 on the release. Oh and Antoine, don't think your hard work on this release has gone unnoticed. I saw all of that JIRA and SVN activity! Daniel On Jul 2, 2010, at 11:47 AM, "Rhett Sutphin" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Daniel Spiewak wrote: > >> Doesn't it seem just a little quick to be pushing out 1.4.1? I don't object >> too strenuously, but it just seems a bit weird. > > I'm in favor of it. Frequent releases let the project adapt to changing > circumstances and fix critical bugs before they scare off potential new > adopters. Many successful projects have frequent releases -- one I can think > of in particular is hudson, which has a release every week. > > So long as the changes are well documented and there's a good (passing) test > suite (both of which are the case with buildr), there's no need for months to > elapse between releases. > > Rhett > >> >> Daniel >> >> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Antoine Toulme >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> We're voting on the source distributions available here: >>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/<http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/> >>> >>> Specifically: >>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.tgz<http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.tgz> >>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.zip<http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.zip> >>> >>> The documentation generated for this release is available here: >>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/<http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/> >>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/buildr.pdf<http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/buildr.pdf> >>> >>> The official specification against which this release was tested: >>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/specs.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/specs.html> >>> >>> Test coverage report: >>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/coverage/index.html<http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/coverage/index.html> >>> >>> >>> The following changes were made since 1.4.0: >>> >>> * Added: BUILDR-420 Support external compiler >>> * Added: BUILDR-425 Specify dev dependencies in .gemspec >>> * Change: BUILDR-459 Update gemspec to accept json_pure ~> 1.4.3 >>> * Fixed: BUILDR-455 cc_spec.rb l 160 depends on time and thus fails >>> intermittently >>> * Fixed: BUILDR-461 Packages with different ids collide >>> * Fixed: BUILDR-439 "The command line is too long" when running TestNG >>> tests >>> * Fixed: BUILDR-463 Setting a system property in the buildfile causes a >>> NoClassDefFoundError >>> >>> This vote is opened for 72h! >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Antoine >>> >
