+1 for the release; though I won't be able to test it until Tuesday. The rationale for such quick release is to resolve an install issue with json-pure dependency. And we agreed to handle install issues more promptly than in the past.
alex On Friday, July 2, 2010, Rhett Sutphin <rh...@detailedbalance.net> wrote: > Hi Antoine, > > On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Antoine Toulme wrote: > >> Thanks Daniel. >> >> Yes, Alex said we should a maintenance release in a couple of weeks after >> 1.4. >> >> I would also like to start delivering releases on time! >> >> Rhett, thanks for finding out that problem. I will apply your approach for >> 1.4.2. I suggest we vote this release and I'll just bump the version when I >> run the release task. Sorry for that oversight. > > Sounds good. A non-binding +1 from me, then. > > Rhett > > >> >> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 09:51, Daniel Spiewak <djspie...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Alrighty then. I'm generally in favor of rapid releases myself, I just >>> wanted to be sure that we weren't rushing things. >>> >>> I vote +1 on the release. Oh and Antoine, don't think your hard work on >>> this release has gone unnoticed. I saw all of that JIRA and SVN activity! >>> >>> Daniel >>> >>> On Jul 2, 2010, at 11:47 AM, "Rhett Sutphin" <rh...@detailedbalance.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Daniel, >>>> >>>> On Jul 2, 2010, at 9:32 AM, Daniel Spiewak wrote: >>>> >>>>> Doesn't it seem just a little quick to be pushing out 1.4.1? I don't >>> object >>>>> too strenuously, but it just seems a bit weird. >>>> >>>> I'm in favor of it. Frequent releases let the project adapt to changing >>> circumstances and fix critical bugs before they scare off potential new >>> adopters. Many successful projects have frequent releases -- one I can >>> think of in particular is hudson, which has a release every week. >>>> >>>> So long as the changes are well documented and there's a good (passing) >>> test suite (both of which are the case with buildr), there's no need for >>> months to elapse between releases. >>>> >>>> Rhett >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Daniel >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Antoine Toulme <anto...@lunar-ocean.com >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> We're voting on the source distributions available here: >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/< >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/> >>>>>> >>>>>> Specifically: >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.tgz< >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.tgz> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.zip< >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/dist/buildr-1.4.1.zip> >>>>>> >>>>>> The documentation generated for this release is available here: >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/< >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/buildr.pdf< >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/buildr.pdf> >>>>>> >>>>>> The official specification against which this release was tested: >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/specs.html< >>> http://people.apache.org/%7Etoulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/specs.html> >>>>>> >>>>>> Test coverage report: >>>>>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~ <http://people.apache.org/~toulmean/buildr/1.4.1/site/coverage/index.html>
