These don't appeal to me as much as fistly and lastly. Also the semantic is a little different than arrays in that 'enhance' is more like 'push' and there's no equivalent to 'lastly'.
alex On Wednesday, November 17, 2010, Antoine Toulme <[email protected]> wrote: > How about sticking with Ruby arrays: > -unshift prepends at the front of the array > -push adds at the end. > > Antoine > > > On Nov 17, 2010, at 12:14 AM, Peter Donald wrote: > >>> I was initially thinking about do_first and do_last but though the "do" was >>> redundant with Ruby's do ... end notation. Do you think that's better? >> >> Not greatly. Maybe firstly and lastly? >> >> task(:foo).firstly do >> # block will be executed before 'enhance' blocks >> end >> >> task(:foo).lastly do >> # block will be executed after 'enhance' blocks >> end >> >> That way it does not double up the "do" word and doesn't look like an >> enumeration. >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> >> Peter Donald > >
