Or maybe before/after ala task(:foo).before do # block will be executed before 'enhance' blocks end
task(:foo).after do # block will be executed after 'enhance' blocks end On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Peter Donald <[email protected]> wrote: >> I was initially thinking about do_first and do_last but though the "do" was >> redundant with Ruby's do ... end notation. Do you think that's better? > > Not greatly. Maybe firstly and lastly? > > task(:foo).firstly do > # block will be executed before 'enhance' blocks > end > > task(:foo).lastly do > # block will be executed after 'enhance' blocks > end > > That way it does not double up the "do" word and doesn't look like an > enumeration. > > -- > Cheers, > > Peter Donald > -- Cheers, Peter Donald
