Hi,
I use bval-guice in some of my projects, and plan to submit a
pull-request on http://sitebricks.org/ that will use bval-guice as
validator engine/injection.
Now that Onami is setup, it sounds like a natural home for bval-guice.
Although, it's not only a 'svn mv', but the doc must also be updated
(e.g.
http://bval.apache.org/obtaining-a-validator.html#Obtainingavalidator-UsingGoogleGuice)
Another point is the ease of release. bval is a TPL, so a new release
does not need to pass the Incubator PMC. I don't see any urgent neeed to
release, or anything that could block on IPMC level, but good to know it.
Thx,
Eric
On 29/01/2013 14:38, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi all BVal friends,
recently we setup a new Incubator Podling called Apache Onami which is
focused on developing and maintaining a set of Google Guice extensions
- in our modest opinion the bval-guice would fit much better in Onami
community where it would be easier involve committers in the
development.
We would like to propose a "move" from BVal to Onami, it could be
easily done by a `svn cp` and continue the development in the Onami
fork.
What do you think guys? Does it sound something reasonable? Do you see
any potential issue?
Many thanks in advance, all the best!
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
