Salut mon ami,

> I use bval-guice in some of my projects, and plan to submit a pull-request
> on http://sitebricks.org/ that will use bval-guice as validator
> engine/injection.
>

great to see that there are more bval-guice users! :)

> Now that Onami is setup, it sounds like a natural home for bval-guice.

indeed, we already discussed, when Onami started his life at ASF, that
this component would fit better in that new place, and we agreed that,
once the whole infrastructure is up and running, we would have
discussed with BVal community that "move".

> Although, it's not only a 'svn mv', but the doc must also be updated (e.g.
> http://bval.apache.org/obtaining-a-validator.html#Obtainingavalidator-UsingGoogleGuice)
>

yes sure, I estimated a small period in the Onami sandbox in order to
complete the migration and updating the doc according to Onami
conventions.

> Another point is the ease of release. bval is a TPL, so a new release does
> not need to pass the Incubator PMC. I don't see any urgent neeed to release,
> or anything that could block on IPMC level, but good to know it.

+1, in TLP the release process would be much more easier - and
quicker! - even if something says to me that we'll not stay in the
Incubator so long... :P

Thanks for your prompt feedbacks!
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/

Reply via email to