I agree. It would be nice to keep the implementation version same as the spec version.
However I also understand in some particular scenario, semantics versioning is required that cause deviation from this naming scheme. Albert. On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: > I am personally in favor of the alpha release but not of the 2.x > versioning. My preference is to manage our versions as does Apache MyFaces, > in basic synch with the implemented specification version. This makes it > quite simple for users to know what they're getting, IMHO. I'd like to find > a group consensus on this issue in any case. > > br, > Matt > On Nov 20, 2013 6:21 AM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Any issue if I try (help would be appreciated if yes) to release bval > > 1.1 branch in alpha (I'll update version to 2.0.0-alpha1) tomorrow? > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > Twitter: @rmannibucau > > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > -- Albert Lee.
