updated to 1.1.0-alpha-SNAPSHOT Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/20 Albert Lee <[email protected]>: > I agree. It would be nice to keep the implementation version same as the > spec version. > > However I also understand in some particular scenario, semantics versioning > is required that cause deviation from this naming scheme. > > > Albert. > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am personally in favor of the alpha release but not of the 2.x >> versioning. My preference is to manage our versions as does Apache MyFaces, >> in basic synch with the implemented specification version. This makes it >> quite simple for users to know what they're getting, IMHO. I'd like to find >> a group consensus on this issue in any case. >> >> br, >> Matt >> On Nov 20, 2013 6:21 AM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi >> > >> > Any issue if I try (help would be appreciated if yes) to release bval >> > 1.1 branch in alpha (I'll update version to 2.0.0-alpha1) tomorrow? >> > >> > Romain Manni-Bucau >> > Twitter: @rmannibucau >> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> > >> > > > > -- > Albert Lee.
