java 7 or java 6 doesn't change the generated bytecode for bval. Java 8 sadly does/did.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> 2016-03-02 17:16 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <[email protected]>: > How is that possible, when Bean Validation 1.1 requires Java 6? I feel > strongly that our implementation should be runnable on the minimum > appropriate JVM version as the implemented specification version. > > Matt > > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> @Matt: not sure I got your question. basically we need to release using >> java 7 during the build and not java 8 like I did. It is enough. >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber >> <http://www.tomitribe.com> >> >> 2016-03-02 16:08 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <[email protected]>: >> >>> How can we release for > Java 6? >>> >>> +1, anyway >>> >>> Matt >>> On Mar 1, 2016 4:12 PM, "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > +1 >>> > >>> > regards, >>> > gerhard >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > 2016-03-01 23:08 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: >>> > >>> > > Hi guys, >>> > > >>> > > last release is java 8 only, to go back on java 7 at least I'd like >>> to >>> > > re-release, any objection? >>> > > >>> > > Romain Manni-Bucau >>> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber >>> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> >>> > > >>> > >>> >> >> >
