Ok seems it was more vicious, since I built locally bval to vote for the release I got a corrupted artifact locally - of course used java 8 ;) - so seems bval is fine so we don't need to release since the changelog is empty. Sorry for the noise guys.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> 2016-03-02 17:30 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > yep exactly. Makes tomee supporting only Java 8 ATM :(. > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > 2016-03-02 17:26 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <[email protected]>: > >> Okay. Is this specifically a problem because of the difference you >> reported with Commons Weaver? >> >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> java 7 or java 6 doesn't change the generated bytecode for bval. Java 8 >>> sadly does/did. >>> >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber >>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> >>> >>> 2016-03-02 17:16 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> How is that possible, when Bean Validation 1.1 requires Java 6? I feel >>>> strongly that our implementation should be runnable on the minimum >>>> appropriate JVM version as the implemented specification version. >>>> >>>> Matt >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> @Matt: not sure I got your question. basically we need to release >>>>> using java 7 during the build and not java 8 like I did. It is enough. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >>>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber >>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> >>>>> >>>>> 2016-03-02 16:08 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>>> How can we release for > Java 6? >>>>>> >>>>>> +1, anyway >>>>>> >>>>>> Matt >>>>>> On Mar 1, 2016 4:12 PM, "Gerhard Petracek" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > +1 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > regards, >>>>>> > gerhard >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > 2016-03-01 23:08 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > Hi guys, >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > last release is java 8 only, to go back on java 7 at least I'd >>>>>> like to >>>>>> > > re-release, any objection? >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber >>>>>> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
