Thanks all for checking that out. I'm working on some issues I found with message interpolation and hope to finish today.
Matt On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 7:18 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > yep > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le jeu. 11 oct. 2018 à 13:11, Roberto Cortez <[email protected]> > a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > Yes, I did try it locally and it does generate the SHA512 file. > > > > As far as I know, Apache Nexus doesn’t handle them yet: > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#distribution_maven < > > http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#distribution_maven> > > > > So, I guess they need to be uploaded manually to the dist area? > > > > Cheers, > > Roberto > > > > > On 11 Oct 2018, at 11:37, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > it gets created automatically if we are on the latest apache-parent. > > > Note that it only gets created locally due to mvn repo limitations > right > > now. > > > > > > So I usually keep the sha1 for all the mails etc, and later create a > > sha512 in the dist svn. > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > > > >> Am 11.10.2018 um 01:41 schrieb David Blevins <[email protected] > >: > > >> > > >> Roberto, do you have any spare cycles to try and upgrade the build to > > output SHA512 hashes in the release profile? > > >> > > >> -- > > >> David Blevins > > >> http://twitter.com/dblevins > > >> http://www.tomitribe.com > > >> > > >>> On Oct 10, 2018, at 9:00 AM, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Something the build needs is to generate a sha256 hash instead of > sha1 > > and > > >>> md5. > > >>> > > >>> Matt > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018, 7:16 AM Mark Struberg <[email protected] > > > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> +1 let's go for it. > > >>>> > > >>>> LieGrue, > > >>>> strub > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>> Am 09.10.2018 um 06:21 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > > [email protected] > > >>>>> : > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Hi David, Matt said he will look this week when I asked last one. > > >>>> Otherwise > > >>>>> i can try to roll it out but only next week. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Le lun. 8 oct. 2018 23:45, David Blevins <[email protected]> > a > > >>>> écrit : > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Hey All! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> The Geronimo validation release is out. Is it possible to get a > > bval > > >>>>>> release of some kind? Final or milestone, the label doesn't > matter. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> For transparency, we're trying to make a CodeOne (Oct 22nd) > > deadline for > > >>>>>> the TomEE 8 release. If we got a bval release this week, we might > > still > > >>>>>> make it. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Happy to help in any way I can. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -David > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> On Sep 26, 2018, at 5:57 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > > [email protected] > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> was more about the new api with the clean javadoc, bval is > already > > >>>>>>> integrated > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > >>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > >>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > >>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > >>>>>>> < > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Le mer. 26 sept. 2018 à 14:57, Thomas Andraschko < > > >>>>>>> [email protected]> a écrit : > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> bval 2.0 won't be integrated? why? Oo > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> Am Mi., 26. Sep. 2018 um 14:50 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >>>>>>>> [email protected]>: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> same here, it will likely not be integrated in tomee 8 anyway. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > >>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > >>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > >>>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Le mer. 26 sept. 2018 à 14:47, Matt Benson <[email protected] > > > > a > > >>>>>> écrit > > >>>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> I think Mark and Romain were pushing to get a patch of Javadoc > > for > > >>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>> Geronimo-published version of the bean validation v2 API > > (first). I > > >>>>>>>>> haven't > > >>>>>>>>>> had time to do this myself and see it as non-essential. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Matt > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 8:13 PM Roberto Cortez > > >>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>>>>>>> Do you need any help to push the release forward? > > >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,Roberto > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 12, 2018, 7:59:20 AM GMT+1, Mark > > Struberg > > >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> right, same approach as I did. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, > > >>>>>>>>>>> strub > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Am 10.09.2018 um 18:32 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> For the ones I did, I just wrote it with "my words". This is > > not > > >>>>>>>> part > > >>>>>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the signature so technically you can write a summary of your > > >>>>>>>> holidays > > >>>>>>>>>>>> (don't please ;)). > > >>>>>>>>>>>> If you have time let's enhance it, if not we can do a .0.1 > > for it, > > >>>>>>>> no > > >>>>>>>>>>> issue > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and happy to lead this next release if needed. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > >>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > >>>>>>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Le lun. 10 sept. 2018 à 14:45, Matt Benson < > > [email protected]> a > > >>>>>>>>>> écrit > > >>>>>>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Geronimo versions of the v1.x specs never had any > > Javadoc to > > >>>>>>>>> speak > > >>>>>>>>>>> of. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> This seems to be a problematic area anyway: how to document > > an > > >>>> API > > >>>>>>>>>>> without > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> infringing the copyright of the reference API. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 2:05 AM Mark Struberg > > >>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wohuuu, trying to make up a bit time today or tomorrow to > > push > > >>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> geronimo-validation_2.0_spec release. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want to add some JavaDocs before that then plz ping > > me > > >>>>>>>> and I > > >>>>>>>>>>> wait > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Need to run the compat checks anyway before we can ship > it. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 28.08.2018 um 15:57 schrieb Matt Benson < > > [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>> : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good catch, Mark! Thanks! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:53 AM Mark Struberg > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We also need to release geronimo-validation-2.0. Will > > trigger > > >>>>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> over > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geronimo. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 27.08.2018 um 20:32 schrieb Roberto Cortez > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great. Let me know if I can help. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 27 Aug 2018, at 16:10, Matt Benson < > > [email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like the basic plan, yes. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 4:55 AM Roberto Cortez > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great! Thanks. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, do you think we can push for a Weaver release, so > > we > > >>>> can > > >>>>>>>>>> then > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> push > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BVal release? We are trying to push for a TomEE 8 > > release, > > >>>>>>>> so > > >>>>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> need > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,Roberto > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, August 24, 2018, 10:20:17 PM GMT+1, Matt > > Benson > > >>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, merged! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018, 12:45 PM Roberto Cortez > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had a look and I think the issue is related with > > this: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg63326.html > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg63326.html > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this should do the trick: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/pull/1 < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/pull/1> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure if the report should be visible in the > > aggregator > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> project. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think not. At least I was able to see the report in > > the > > >>>>>>>>>> processor > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope it helps! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roberto > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm still trying to find time to finish the 1.4 > > release > > >>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Commons > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Weaver. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought it was ready, but since traffic on the > > Commons > > >>>>>>>> ML > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> alerted > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I should double check that the japicmp report is > > actually > > >>>>>>>>>>> running > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site goal. I might be able to take another look > this > > >>>>>>>> Friday. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 2:54 AM Thomas Andraschko < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto: > > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-08-22 9:52 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> | Blog > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/ < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>> | Old Blog > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Github <https://github.com/ <https://github.com/> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn < > https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>> | Book > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < > > >>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- > > >>>>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ee-8-high-performance> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 22 août 2018 à 09:46, Mark Struberg > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto: > > >>>>>>>> [email protected] > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit : > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hi folks! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we want to go for a BVal-2.0.0 release? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems we pass the TCK, so we should really kick > > it off > > >>>>>>>>> I'd > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> say. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wdyt? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > > > > > >
