Hi, Yes, I did try it locally and it does generate the SHA512 file.
As far as I know, Apache Nexus doesn’t handle them yet: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#distribution_maven <http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#distribution_maven> So, I guess they need to be uploaded manually to the dist area? Cheers, Roberto > On 11 Oct 2018, at 11:37, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > it gets created automatically if we are on the latest apache-parent. > Note that it only gets created locally due to mvn repo limitations right now. > > So I usually keep the sha1 for all the mails etc, and later create a sha512 > in the dist svn. > > LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am 11.10.2018 um 01:41 schrieb David Blevins <[email protected]>: >> >> Roberto, do you have any spare cycles to try and upgrade the build to output >> SHA512 hashes in the release profile? >> >> -- >> David Blevins >> http://twitter.com/dblevins >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >>> On Oct 10, 2018, at 9:00 AM, Matt Benson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Something the build needs is to generate a sha256 hash instead of sha1 and >>> md5. >>> >>> Matt >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018, 7:16 AM Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 let's go for it. >>>> >>>> LieGrue, >>>> strub >>>> >>>> >>>>> Am 09.10.2018 um 06:21 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] >>>>> : >>>>> >>>>> Hi David, Matt said he will look this week when I asked last one. >>>> Otherwise >>>>> i can try to roll it out but only next week. >>>>> >>>>> Le lun. 8 oct. 2018 23:45, David Blevins <[email protected]> a >>>> écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> Hey All! >>>>>> >>>>>> The Geronimo validation release is out. Is it possible to get a bval >>>>>> release of some kind? Final or milestone, the label doesn't matter. >>>>>> >>>>>> For transparency, we're trying to make a CodeOne (Oct 22nd) deadline for >>>>>> the TomEE 8 release. If we got a bval release this week, we might still >>>>>> make it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Happy to help in any way I can. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -David >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sep 26, 2018, at 5:57 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] >>>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> was more about the new api with the clean javadoc, bval is already >>>>>>> integrated >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>>>>> < >>>>>> >>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le mer. 26 sept. 2018 à 14:57, Thomas Andraschko < >>>>>>> [email protected]> a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> bval 2.0 won't be integrated? why? Oo >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am Mi., 26. Sep. 2018 um 14:50 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>> [email protected]>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> same here, it will likely not be integrated in tomee 8 anyway. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Le mer. 26 sept. 2018 à 14:47, Matt Benson <[email protected]> a >>>>>> écrit >>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I think Mark and Romain were pushing to get a patch of Javadoc for >>>> the >>>>>>>>>> Geronimo-published version of the bean validation v2 API (first). I >>>>>>>>> haven't >>>>>>>>>> had time to do this myself and see it as non-essential. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Matt >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 8:13 PM Roberto Cortez >>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> Do you need any help to push the release forward? >>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,Roberto >>>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 12, 2018, 7:59:20 AM GMT+1, Mark Struberg >>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> right, same approach as I did. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Am 10.09.2018 um 18:32 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> For the ones I did, I just wrote it with "my words". This is not >>>>>>>> part >>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> the signature so technically you can write a summary of your >>>>>>>> holidays >>>>>>>>>>>> (don't please ;)). >>>>>>>>>>>> If you have time let's enhance it, if not we can do a .0.1 for it, >>>>>>>> no >>>>>>>>>>> issue >>>>>>>>>>>> and happy to lead this next release if needed. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Le lun. 10 sept. 2018 à 14:45, Matt Benson <[email protected]> a >>>>>>>>>> écrit >>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The Geronimo versions of the v1.x specs never had any Javadoc to >>>>>>>>> speak >>>>>>>>>>> of. >>>>>>>>>>>>> This seems to be a problematic area anyway: how to document an >>>> API >>>>>>>>>>> without >>>>>>>>>>>>> infringing the copyright of the reference API. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 2:05 AM Mark Struberg >>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wohuuu, trying to make up a bit time today or tomorrow to push >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> geronimo-validation_2.0_spec release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want to add some JavaDocs before that then plz ping me >>>>>>>> and I >>>>>>>>>>> wait >>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> bit. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Need to run the compat checks anyway before we can ship it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 28.08.2018 um 15:57 schrieb Matt Benson <[email protected] >>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good catch, Mark! Thanks! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 6:53 AM Mark Struberg >>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We also need to release geronimo-validation-2.0. Will trigger >>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>> over >>>>>>>>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Geronimo. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 27.08.2018 um 20:32 schrieb Roberto Cortez >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great. Let me know if I can help. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 27 Aug 2018, at 16:10, Matt Benson <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like the basic plan, yes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 4:55 AM Roberto Cortez >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great! Thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, do you think we can push for a Weaver release, so we >>>> can >>>>>>>>>> then >>>>>>>>>>>>>> push >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BVal release? We are trying to push for a TomEE 8 release, >>>>>>>> so >>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>> need >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,Roberto >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Friday, August 24, 2018, 10:20:17 PM GMT+1, Matt Benson >>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, merged! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018, 12:45 PM Roberto Cortez >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had a look and I think the issue is related with this: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg63326.html >>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg63326.html >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this should do the trick: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/pull/1 < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/commons-weaver/pull/1> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure if the report should be visible in the aggregator >>>>>>>>>>>>> project. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think not. At least I was able to see the report in the >>>>>>>>>> processor >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope it helps! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roberto >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm still trying to find time to finish the 1.4 release >>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>> Commons >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Weaver. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought it was ready, but since traffic on the Commons >>>>>>>> ML >>>>>>>>>>>>> alerted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I should double check that the japicmp report is actually >>>>>>>>>>> running >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site goal. I might be able to take another look this >>>>>>>> Friday. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 2:54 AM Thomas Andraschko < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto: >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-08-22 9:52 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/ < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/>> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Github <https://github.com/ <https://github.com/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>> | Book >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < >>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- >>>>>>>> < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ee-8-high-performance> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le mer. 22 août 2018 à 09:46, Mark Struberg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto: >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hi folks! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we want to go for a BVal-2.0.0 release? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Seems we pass the TCK, so we should really kick it off >>>>>>>>> I'd >>>>>>>>>>>>> say. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wdyt? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >
