+1, fine to lazy branches v3 too
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> | .NET Blog <https://dotnetbirdie.github.io/> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.github.io/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064> Javaccino <https://javaccino.dev/> founder (Java/.NET service - contact via linkedin) Le mer. 5 août 2026, 14:00, Thomas Andraschko <[email protected]> a écrit : > +1 to branch 3.1 and make 4.0 master > > Am Mi., 5. Aug. 2026 um 13:57 Uhr schrieb Markus Jung <[email protected]>: > > > Hey all, > > > > > > after updating the site for 3.1.0 today I saw that there's ongoing work > > on the validation 4.0 spec. Had some time on my hand today so I decided > > to give implementing it a try, I pushed my changes to the bval-4.x > > branch and it's passing the current SNAPSHOT build of the validation TCK. > > > > > > I' like to propose merging this into the master branch and branching off > > the current master into bval-3.1.x? Our 3.1 implementation is complete > > and I feel like development should probably move on to 4.x now. WDYT? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Markus > > > > >
