Yeah, let's leave the vote open for a while while I & others give it
due diligence.

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote:
> FYI, I think I actually have to -1 this one myself as I just remembered that
> I forgot to bump the minor.version property in the build from 6 to 7. I also
> need to write a proper post for the eventual Avatica 1.7.0 on the website (I
> left a placeholder).
>
> I would still be very happy to get feedback on this release since it is the
> first of its kind.
>
>
> Josh Elser wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have created a build for Apache Calcite Avatica 1.7.0, release
>> candidate 0.
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release. This is the
>> first release candidate for a release that enables us to split the
>> Avatica project away from the "traditional" Apache Calcite build.
>>
>> The commit to be voted upon:
>>
>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/calcite/commit/e697175ac6faef1ed5204a9de1adb8b30a850ec4
>>
>>
>> Its hash is e697175ac6faef1ed5204a9de1adb8b30a850ec4.
>>
>> The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-avatica-1.7.0-rc0/
>>
>>
>> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
>> src.tar.gz.md5 10034a947606a16e5aeb868cf36628d2
>> src.tar.gz.sha1 82707a54bf12ce46974e9acabca9a8fbb3f5ef21
>> src.zip.md5 0614e28f261fd7ba9c3d693fa6d8c0aa
>> src.zip.sha1 87dfa24fb41491ceb4aae298c48a1ac724e5d275
>>
>> A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1013
>>
>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/elserj.asc
>>
>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite Avatica 1.7.0.
>>
>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of
>> at least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite Avatica 1.7.0
>> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>
>>
>> Here is my vote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>

Reply via email to