+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:43 AM Laurent Goujon <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:25 PM, James Taylor <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:15 PM Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Thanks for running this vote, Josh. > > > > > > > On Mar 26, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Josh Elser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Hopefully you've all caught the discussion on this subject by now > > > (CALCITE-1717, and this thread[1]). A few of us are leaning towards > > > physically separating the Avatica and Calcite codebases. We think that > > this > > > will ultimately help each project grow at their own rate and give us > more > > > flexibility without stomping on each others' toes. > > > > > > > > This is a (lazy-consensus) VOTE to perform this separation. For the > > > actions that would be taken as a result of this, please see this list > in > > > CALCITE-1717. > > > > > > > > Finally, let's please hold off on any commits to Avatica until we get > > > this resolved. As Julian has pointed out, this gives us a nice > separation > > > (on the heels of Calcite-1.12.0). > > > > > > > > Per ASF norms, this vote will be open for at least 72hrs (2017/03/29 > > > 1700GMT). Please let us know if there are any objections or input on > this > > > separation. Thanks! > > > > > > > > - Josh > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b49639d926e64955cdca49aca1d218 > > 3f00812b54d2d5957499d39c9f@%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > >
