Thanks! -- Michael Mior [email protected]
Le lun. 25 juin 2018 à 20:17, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> a écrit : > I’m reviewing and testing just the package-exclusion part now. Hopefully > will commit shortly. > > > On Jun 25, 2018, at 2:11 PM, Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > PS. ES2+ES5 changes will be submitted in a couple of days. > > > > On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 4:56 PM Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Temporary excluded elasticsearch2 package from javadoc. This should > >> unblock users. > >> Tested with JDK 8,9 and 10 (maven 3.5.2 / 3.5.4) macOSX > >> > >> Please double-check PR-741 <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/741> > >> > >> CALCITE-2376 (unify ES2 and ES5) has been agreed upon with Christian and > >> Michael. Once implemented, it should automatically fix current classpath > >> issue in javadoc. > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:23 PM Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> OK. I'm working on it. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 2:18 PM Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>>> On Jun 25, 2018, at 11:11 AM, Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Would you consider merging this partial javadoc fix (PR 741 > >>>>> <https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/741>) as precursor for > >>>> CALCITE-2376 ? > >>>>> Former PR has also fixes javadoc issues for mongo adapter. > >>>> > >>>> No. > >>>> > >>>> I have 5 commits that I would like to merge but cannot because my > builds > >>>> fail. We need to fix the big problem before we do anything else. > >>>> > >>>>> I'm working on CALCITE-2376 which unifies ES2 and ES5 adapters. I'll > >>>> make > >>>>> sure it is passing both javadoc / site tasks in maven. > >>>> > >>>> Sounds very cool, but I’m not an ES expert. I think you should get > >>>> buy-in from other people who have worked on the ES adapter(s) before > you go > >>>> too far down that path. > >>>> > >>>> Also, it is a big solution to a small (but urgent) problem. Let’s fix > >>>> that problem with a quick, small fix. > >>>> > >>>>> On a separate note, do you think it makes sense to add javadoc > >>>> generation > >>>>> to travis build ? > >>>> > >>>> I would love to, but IIRC, travis times out if you add javadoc > >>>> generation. > >>>> > >>>> Julian > >>>> > >>>> > >
