Two existing JIRA cases that relate to this are https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1041 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1041> and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-986 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-986>.
This case seems different because it is a user-defined TABLE function. I don’t think that has been tested before, therefore I wouldn’t consider it “done". The first step is to a bug “DATE and TIMESTAMP arguments to user-defined table function”, and the second step is to write a test in TableFunctionTest. Julian > On Oct 25, 2018, at 5:32 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Will try, thanks. > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 2:16 PM Vladimir Sitnikov < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Then it might be a bug >> in org/apache/calcite/linq4j/tree/OptimizeShuttle.java:277 >> Have you tried to comment that branch out for test purposes? >> >> Vladimir >> > > > -- > Piotr Bojko > http://about.me/ptr.bojko
