Hello, I have submitted https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2641 . I've proposed a path there in a comment but I think it would be best to accept the approach first - then I can contribute the patch.
Thanks for help and support Pete On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 7:15 PM Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > Two existing JIRA cases that relate to this are > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1041 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1041> and > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-986 < > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-986>. > > This case seems different because it is a user-defined TABLE function. I > don’t think that has been tested before, therefore I wouldn’t consider it > “done". The first step is to a bug “DATE and TIMESTAMP arguments to > user-defined table function”, and the second step is to write a test in > TableFunctionTest. > > Julian > > > > > On Oct 25, 2018, at 5:32 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > Will try, thanks. > > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 2:16 PM Vladimir Sitnikov < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Then it might be a bug > >> in org/apache/calcite/linq4j/tree/OptimizeShuttle.java:277 > >> Have you tried to comment that branch out for test purposes? > >> > >> Vladimir > >> > > > > > > -- > > Piotr Bojko > > http://about.me/ptr.bojko > > -- Piotr Bojko http://about.me/ptr.bojko
