>From the two builds: - Working - Java version: 11.0.1, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime: /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64 - Failed - Java version: 11.0.2, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime: /usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64
Testing with this locally to see how this reproduces and can look into fixing. Kevin Risden On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:34 PM Kevin Risden <[email protected]> wrote: > I can take a look. I poked around a bit yesterday and saw the same thing > about the commit not changing javadocs. Not sure if JDK 11 got updated to > have this issue. I'll see what it takes to fix. > > Kevin Risden > > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 2:30 PM Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Does someone else have time to take a look? >> >> >> > On Feb 8, 2019, at 11:17 AM, Vladimir Sitnikov < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Julian> Vladimir, can you please take a look? >> > >> > As you see, the commit did not touch "Calcite Plus", so I don't really >> > think the commit is to blame here. It looks more like JDK-8212233 to >> > me. >> > On top of that, Calcite Plus does not build on my machine (see >> > CALCITE-2816 PsTableFunction fails in Russian locale), so I've a >> > half-baked excuse there as well. >> > >> > So I'm inlined to tentatively decline your offer. >> > >> > Vladimir >> >>
