+1 Having one vcs to deal with, is good; automating the publication of the site is great!
Στις Δευ, 11 Φεβ 2019 στις 8:00 μ.μ., ο/η Michael Mior <mm...@apache.org> έγραψε: > +1 for me as well and another +1 for automation if we can have this > happen from the "site" branch. > -- > Michael Mior > mm...@apache.org > > Le lun. 11 févr. 2019 à 05:01, Francis Chuang > <francischu...@apache.org> a écrit : > > > > Hey all, > > > > ASF project sites have the ability to use git instead of subversion as > > their repository for web site content [1]. It has been available since > > 2015 and appears to be quite stable. Quite a few other projects have > > also moved their websites to git and subsequently, Gitbox (for using > > Github as their source of truth. As an example, see the Arrow project > [2]. > > > > I myself would love to see this as I find gits interface and ux to be > > much easier to use compared to svn. It also reduces the need to context > > switch between Git and svn when editing and pushing the site. > > > > My overall goal is to find a way to automate the publishing and build of > > our websites either via Jenkins builds (there are some projects are > > doing this already when I searched infra) or the new Github actions [3]. > > Having the site hosted in Git would make this process much easier to > > automate. I will need to get in touch with infra to clarify a few things > > and to see if this is feasible, but I think this is a worthwhile > endeavor. > > > > How do you guys feel about moving our site's repository from svn to > GitBox? > > > > Francis > > > > > > [1] https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/git_based_websites_available > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17655 > > [3] https://github.com/features/actions >
