Maven version 3.6.0 seems a too much new version, now most of the developers 
use 3.2.x and 3.3.x version maven, i think it will be bad to run fail test 
cases just because the maven version is old.

Best,
YuZhao Chen
在 2019年3月10日 +0800 AM1:28,Andrei Sereda <[email protected]>,写道:
> Greetings,
>
>
> I would like to start a gradual migration of calcite test codebase to
> [JUnit5](https://junit.org/junit5/). The plan is to do in several steps
> outlined below :
>
> 1. Upgrade maven wrapper to 3.6.0 (surefire plugin needs to work with
> JUnit5 >= 2.22.0). Maybe enforce maven 3.6.0 during builds.
> 2. Add new dependencies to maven pom (jupiter and vantage).
> 3. Migrate all basic tests to new JUnit5 API. Basic in this context means
> tests without [rules](https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/wiki/rules) or
> [runners](
> https://github.com/junit-team/junit4/wiki/test-runners#runwith-annotation)
> just basic `@Test` / `@Before` / `@Ignore` annotations. Code where I can
> just apply string/replace and make it work in JUnit5.
> 4. Migrate remaining tests (with `@Parameterized` / `@ClassRule` etc.). For
> example, I will have to write custom extensions for existing elastic /
> mongo / cassandra / geode class rules.
>
> For developers that means you will need to have a reasonably recent IDE /
> Maven:
> 1. For IntelliJ this is >= 2016.2
> 2. For Eclipse this is >= Oxygen.1a (4.7.1a)
> 3. For Maven >= 3.6.0 (released on 2018-10-24)
>
> Questions to fellow calcitians:
>
> 1. Do you agree with JUnit5 migration ?
> 2. Do you agree with the plan ?
> 3. Should I wait for 1.20 release ?
> 4. Anything I missed ?
>
> Regards,
> Andrei.

Reply via email to