+1 (non-binding)

- check sha512 OK
- check gpg signature OK (last timely I forgot to import calcite KEYS
locally, sorry about that)
- ./gradlew build OK
- check the rc3 tag with right commit OK
- compare git tag files with files extracted from artifacts, There is a
difference about LICENSE file. Also the artifact has one extra "licenses"
directory . By reading the diff I think it is still OK. (Also it should be
a known case that appeared in a past release)
- Tested the artifact with Apache Beam. There are breaks but none is
regression (e.g. break due to some API evolutions, which is
understandable). OK


-Rui




On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 2:10 PM Francis Chuang <[email protected]>
wrote:

> My vote is +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for making this rc available for voting, Danny!
>
> Checked GPG signature - OK
> Checked hash - OK
> Ran tests per HOWTO (./gradlew check) - OK
> Release notes (quick skim) - OK
> Maven artifacts (spot checked a few files on nexus) - OK
>
> Environment (gradle:latest docker container):
> Gradle 6.1.1 (via gradlew)
> Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS
> openjdk version "1.8.0_232"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 1.8.0_232-b09)
> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (AdoptOpenJDK)(build 25.232-b09, mixed mode)
>
> Great work, Danny!
>
> My reasons for voting +1:
> - This release is overdue and since we are at rc3 already, this is
> probably causing the RM a lot of release fatigue. I've been RM for a few
> releases where a lot of RCs were created and it's discouraging to have
> another rc rejected and having to go back and build another one.
>
> - This is a pretty big release and there endless improvements and bugs
> that can be added to this release. We should get this release out and
> aim for the next release to clean up these regressions.
>
> - CALCITE-3839 is a regression, but as this release is already quite
> delayed and we are planning to make the next release (1.23.0) available
> soon after this release, it's possible to skip this release and wait for
> the next one.
>
> - I'd suggest adding a daily job in CI that integrates with Calcite
> master to catch regressions such as CALCITE-3839.
>
>
> On 3/03/2020 12:28 am, Danny Chan wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.22.0, release
> > candidate 3.
> >
> > Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
> >
> > You can read the release notes here:
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/v1.22.0-rc3/site/_docs/history.md
> >
> > The commit to be voted upon:
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=537b8dbb4b58c61b6c573eb07a51b8d38896a1ff
> >
> > Its hash is 537b8dbb4b58c61b6c573eb07a51b8d38896a1ff
> >
> > Tag:
> > https://github.com/apache/calcite/tree/v1.22.0-rc3
> >
> > The artifacts to be voted on are located here:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calcite/apache-calcite-1.22.0-rc3
> > (revision 38350)
> >
> > The hashes of the artifacts are as follows:
> >
> a7dface824287756fcc66f6f075286975e409e7ea9a0af97ad973f90bc2832250c09e0477bc571bd78f6ee3721883cce76cada9a3e9601e1dd497fb02679647f
> > *apache-calcite-1.22.0-src.tar.gz
> >
> > A staged Maven repository is available for review at:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecalcite-1080/org/apache/calcite/
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/danny0405.asc
> > https://www.apache.org/dist/calcite/KEYS
> >
> > N.B.
> > To create the jars and test Apache Calcite: "./gradlew build".
> >
> > If you do not have a Java environment available, you can run the tests
> > using docker. To do so, install docker and docker-compose, then run
> > "docker-compose run test" from the root of the directory.
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Calcite 1.22.0.
> >
> > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > least three +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Calcite 1.22.0
> > [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the release
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> >
> > Here is my vote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Danny Chan
> >
>

Reply via email to