> However, I don't see evidence to support your claims that this will bring
no new contributors nor make anyone feel more welcome. I'm not claiming
that I can point to any specific individual who will be positively impacted
by this change and I will admit that it's possible that no one will be

Evidence? I didn't see any evidence that it will make anybody feel more
welcome, and even you and most of the other folks here doubt it.

> However, I think the "disruption" to the project is minimal.

Just look at this thread and to the issue: you're not sure how to proceed.
You have to discuss it. It's like if you change a phone number: you can say
it's a minimal change, but all your contacts have to do amendments. You
have to do a public announcement, etc.

> Given that I was the one who proposed the change, I'll add that your
> assessment that this is political is false. No one is ordering this
change.
> It was brought to the community for discussion.

So you say that it just popped in your mind with no relation to the current
political trends? And you even admit that maybe nobody will be positively
impacted, but still are pushing it? For what reason then?

Viliam

-- 
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individuals named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and 
delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be 
guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, 
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. 
The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions 
in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail 
transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard-copy 
version. -Hazelcast

Reply via email to