Hello,

Does anybody want to mention any highlights for 1.25 besides removal of
deprecated methods  ?

Currently it says:
=======
This release comes shortly after 1.24.0 (in just two weeks) and removes
methods which were deprecated in the previous version.
=======

Thanks,
Andrei.

On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 11:12 AM Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I'm starting the release today. If there are some PRs which you would like
> to be included in 1.25 please let me know ASAP.
>
> This should be a quick release mostly for CALCITE-4136
>
> Thanks,
> Andrei.
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 4:33 AM Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Andrei,
>>
>> We agreed that this would be a quick release. Above I mentioned Aug
>> 8th as a target, and it's Aug 7th already. Can you start moving the
>> release process along, please.
>>
>> Julian
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 2:23 PM Andrei Sereda <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Julian,
>> >
>> > Yes this time I should have enough cycles for the release.
>> >
>> > Also, I think Danny did the heavy lifting with 1.22 since it wasn't an
>> easy
>> > one.
>> >
>> > Andrei.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020, 16:16 Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Andrei,
>> > >
>> > > That would be great. Last time I recall you had a crunch at $dayjob
>> that
>> > > didn’t leave you with enough cycles to be release manager. I think
>> this
>> > > release should be timely, so if that is a concern this time around,
>> let us
>> > > know.
>> > >
>> > > (Maybe the fact that this release is very time-boxed will make that
>> less
>> > > of a risk. I really think we could get this done in by Aug 8 - i.e. 2
>> weeks
>> > > - if we focus.)
>> > >
>> > > Julian
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > On Jul 24, 2020, at 9:57 AM, Andrei Sereda <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > It should be me.
>> > > >
>> > > > I swapped the 1.22 release with Danny Chen who was supposed to be
>> release
>> > > > manager for 1.25
>> > > >
>> > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 12:52 PM Haisheng Yuan <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Do we have release manager for v1.25.0?
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On 2020/07/23 17:15:12, Julian Hyde <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>> The release vote for 1.24 RC0 just passed [1], and it will be
>> released
>> > > >> shortly.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> We planned that release 1.24 is a transitional release, and 1.25
>> will
>> > > >> follow soon afterwards. 1.24 deprecates some APIs that we intend to
>> > > remove
>> > > >> in 1.25. We had to make the release so that people can see that
>> the APIs
>> > > >> are deprecated, and replace them with the new versions.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> During the release vote we ran into 4136 [2]. This is a real bug,
>> > > caused
>> > > >> in part by the API changes to deprecate APIs (and provide long-term
>> > > >> replacements) and in part caused by 4079 [3], the real bug that we
>> are
>> > > >> trying to solve in 1.25.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> So, it is important that we release 1.25 soon, and that it solves
>> all
>> > > of
>> > > >> these problems. I don’t know whether people will perceive 1.24 as a
>> > > release
>> > > >> “lower than our usual quality” (even though there are good reasons
>> for
>> > > it)
>> > > >> but 1.25 needs to be back to the usual quality.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Julian
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4117 <
>> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4117>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4136 <
>> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4136>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4079 <
>> > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4079>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>>
>

Reply via email to